This is How BDS boycott Campaign is going in 2024| BDS Boycott List

The BDS Movement (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) is a Palestinian-led effort aimed at pressuring Israel to change its policies towards Palestinians. It calls for Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian land, ensure full equality for Palestinian citizens, and allow Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. Inspired by movements like the anti-apartheid campaign in South Africa, BDS promotes justice and equal rights for Palestinians through peaceful means.

Since it began in 2005, the BDS movement has grown into a global network, supported by people, organizations, and communities all over the world. Through boycotts of products, divestment from companies tied to the occupation, and calls for sanctions, BDS encourages people to take action. Despite facing opposition from some governments, the movement continues to push for change, raising awareness about the Palestinian struggle for freedom and equality.

Purpose and Goals

The BDS movement focuses on three main objectives:
End the Israeli Occupation: Demand an end to the Israeli military presence in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Achieve Equal Rights: Ensure equal rights for Palestinian citizens of Israel.
Right of Return: Support the return of Palestinian refugees to their homes, in line with UN Resolution 194.

Timeline of Events

2005: The BDS movement is formally launched by over 170 Palestinian organizations.
2008-2009: The Gaza conflict leads to increased international support for BDS.
2014: The Gaza War sparks global protests and renewed calls for BDS.
2024: The movement remains active, with recent campaigns targeting major Israeli companies and cultural institutions.

Key campaigns Under BDS Movement

The BDS Movement operates through a variety of campaigns that focus on different areas to challenge Israel’s policies toward Palestinians. These campaigns are divided into boycotts, divestment, and sanctions as follow:

Boycott: Boycotts encourage consumers to stop buying products or supporting companies that are involved in the occupation of Palestinian territories. This can range from everyday goods in supermarkets to cultural and academic institutions.
Divestment: Divestment pushes larger organizations, such as universities, pension funds, and corporations, to withdraw their investments from companies profiting from Israel’s occupation.
Sanctions: Sanctions involve pressuring governments to impose economic and political penalties on Israel until it complies with international law.

Campaign Areas:

These efforts are further divided into specific campaign areas, including academic, cultural, and economic boycotts.

Cultural Boycotts: Urging artists and performers to avoid events in Israel.
Academic Boycotts: Encouraging universities to cut ties with Israeli institutions.
Economic Divestment: Campaigning for businesses and institutions to withdraw investments from Israeli companies by launching BDS Boycott Lists.

Top Israeli Brands Under BDS Boycott List

The Brands and products targetted by BDS have 4 different categories on purpose as follow:

Consumer Boycott Targets

The BDS movement urges consumers to completely boycott certain brands that have been specifically identified for their direct involvement in supporting Israeli apartheid. These companies have a history of enabling human rights violations against Palestinians, making them central to BDS’s consumer activism. The boycott is intended to hold these corporations accountable by targeting their sales, impacting their revenue, and sending a clear message that their complicity will not be tolerated.

Divestment and Exclusion Targets

BDS focuses on pressuring governments, institutions, and investment bodies to divest from and exclude companies linked to Israeli military actions and illegal settlements. This involves cutting ties with corporations, especially those involved in arms manufacturing and banking, that profit from the occupation of Palestinian land. BDS relies on reliable sources, such as the AFSC’s lists and UN databases, to identify companies benefiting from Israel’s occupation, aiming to erode their financial support and legitimacy on an institutional level.

Pressure Targets

These targets are subject to ongoing pressure campaigns aimed at changing their practices. BDS calls for a combination of boycotts, lobbying efforts, peaceful protests, and social media activism against companies that are complicit in Israel’s apartheid system. By rallying public awareness and action, these campaigns strive to create economic and social consequences for entities that perpetuate Israeli human rights abuses, pushing them toward change.

Organic Boycott Targets

These are brands that have become the subject of grassroots boycott movements independently of BDS. However, the movement lends its support because these companies are also linked to Israel’s apartheid and genocidal actions. These campaigns are driven by widespread public outrage, and BDS amplifies them by aligning its global network with these efforts, helping to further the collective goal of ending corporate complicity in Israel’s violations.

BDS Boycott list 2024

Following is the complete BDS boycott list vetted by Boycottlists.com:

Consumer boycott Targets

Hewlett Packard plays a key role in maintaining Israel’s biometric ID system, which restricts the movement of Palestinians within the occupied territories. This technology is used at checkpoints and in other oppressive systems designed to control Palestinian lives. HP’s involvement in the occupation makes it a prime target for boycotts, as activists push the company to stop profiting from apartheid.

Chevron, through its ownership of Noble Energy, profits from natural gas extraction in the Eastern Mediterranean, much of which Israel claims. The revenues generated from this extraction fuel Israel’s military and economy, allowing it to continue its occupation and oppression of Palestinians. Chevron’s operations are not only complicit in sustaining Israel’s apartheid but also contribute to the global climate crisis by promoting fossil fuel consumption. This makes Chevron a target for divestment both for its role in Israel and its environmental impact.

AXA continues to invest in Israeli banks that finance the theft of Palestinian land and resources. These investments directly support the apartheid system, making AXA complicit in Israel’s war crimes. Boycotting AXA insurance policies and switching to alternatives is a way for consumers to protest the company’s role in the occupation and press for divestment.

Ahava’s production facilities are located in the occupied West Bank, on land illegally taken from Palestinians. The company profits from the natural resources of the region, exploiting them for its cosmetics line.

Puma’s sponsorship of the Israel Football Association, which includes teams based in illegal settlements, has made the sportswear company a target for boycotts. By supporting Israeli football teams that play on stolen Palestinian land, Puma is accused of profiting from the occupation. Activists are calling for a global boycott of Puma until the company ends its sponsorship of these teams. Read more about Puma Boycott

Siemens is deeply involved in the EuroAsia Interconnector, a project that will link Israel’s electricity grid with Europe. By connecting Israel’s power infrastructure to the EU, Siemens is helping to normalize and profit from the illegal settlements. The company’s role in this project further entrenches Israel’s occupation while contributing to the climate crisis, as the electricity generated is from fossil fuels.

SodaStream’s factory in the Naqab (Negev) region is part of Israel’s displacement of Bedouin-Palestinian communities. The company has faced criticism for its exploitation of Palestinian workers and its role in reinforcing Israel’s settler-colonial policies. The boycott of SodaStream aims to pressure the company to stop operating on occupied land and to support Palestinian rights.

Divestment And exclusion targets

Elbit is Israel’s largest arms manufacturer, known for testing weapons on Palestinians during ongoing military operations. The company’s technologies are used in drones, surveillance systems, and Israel’s apartheid wall, all of which reinforce the oppression of Palestinians. Beyond Israel, Elbit’s products are also used by the US and EU for border militarization, connecting the company to global violations of refugee and human rights. Activists call for divestment from Elbit due to its direct role in enabling and profiting from apartheid.

Barclays has been criticized for its financial support of companies that supply weapons and military technology to Israel. The bank holds over £1 billion in shares and provides billions more in loans to companies involved in Israel’s military operations against Palestinians. Barclays’ financial ties to these industries make it a key target for divestment campaigns, as activists push for ethical investment practices. The bank’s role in financing these companies implicates it in the violence inflicted on Palestinians.

These global machinery companies provide heavy equipment used by Israel to demolish Palestinian homes and construct illegal settlements. The destruction facilitated by their machinery displaces Palestinian families, erases their history, and contributes to Israel’s settlement expansion. In addition to demolitions, their equipment is also used in building infrastructure like roads and walls that serve the settlements. These companies, while not Israeli, are complicit in war crimes by enabling the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

Intel’s relationship with Israel dates back decades, making it a major player in bolstering Israel’s economy. The company’s first R&D center outside the US was established in Haifa in 1974, and it has since expanded its operations, including building a plant on expropriated Palestinian land. Intel’s ongoing investment of billions, including its most recent pledge of $25 billion, demonstrates its deep ties to Israel, particularly at a time when international protests against Israel’s actions are intensifying. Intel’s involvement exemplifies how tech companies profit from occupation.

CAF, a Basque transportation company, builds and services the Jerusalem Light Rail, a tram system that connects illegal Israeli settlements to Jerusalem. By participating in this project, CAF directly benefits from the occupation and helps solidify Israel’s control over Palestinian land. The rail system serves settlers while excluding Palestinians, reinforcing the segregation of the two populations. CAF’s involvement is a clear example of a company profiting from infrastructure that supports Israel’s apartheid policies.

These companies manufacture surveillance equipment used by Israel to monitor and control Palestinian communities. HikVision’s high-resolution cameras are installed in Palestinian neighborhoods and along military checkpoints, creating a surveillance state that strips Palestinians of their privacy and freedoms. TKH Security provides similar equipment, with some products being used by Israeli police to enforce apartheid. By supplying the tools for mass surveillance, these companies are complicit in entrenching Israel’s occupation and control over Palestinians.

Pressure Targets

These travel platforms have faced criticism for listing rental properties located in illegal Israeli settlements. Despite a brief period where Airbnb announced it would delist these properties, it later reversed the decision, allowing settlers to continue profiting from stolen Palestinian land. By facilitating tourism in occupied territories, these companies normalize the occupation and allow settlers to profit from their illegal activities. Activists call for travelers to boycott these platforms until they stop enabling the occupation.

Teva, the largest generic drug manufacturer in the world, profits from its operations in Israel, including its monopoly over the Palestinian market. Palestinians are forced to rely on Teva products, as Israel’s control over their healthcare system limits access to alternatives. By operating in the occupied territories, Teva benefits from the apartheid system that restricts Palestinian sovereignty. Activists call for boycotts of Teva to pressure the company to divest from Israel’s occupation.

In 2021, both Google and Amazon signed a contract worth over $1 billion to provide cloud computing services to the Israeli government and military. This technology is crucial for Israel’s operations, including its ongoing occupation and military actions in Gaza. By supplying these services, Google and Amazon are directly supporting the infrastructure that enables Israel’s apartheid system. The #NoTechForApartheid campaign calls for the boycott and divestment from these tech giants until they stop profiting from human rights abuses.

hrough its ownership of Marvel Studios, Disney is facing backlash for promoting Israeli narratives in its upcoming Captain America film. Palestinian cultural organizations have criticized Disney for glorifying Israel’s apartheid policies and settler-colonial violence against Palestinians. By portraying a superhero that embodies Israel, Disney is accused of spreading propaganda that whitewashes Israel’s human rights abuses. The boycott of Disney is part of a broader push to hold entertainment companies accountable for their role in shaping public perceptions of oppression.

Grassroots Boycott Targets

McDonald’s franchises in Israel have been providing free meals to soldiers, directly supporting the military during its operations against Palestinians. This corporate backing has made McDonald’s a key target for grassroots boycott campaigns worldwide. Activists argue that by serving soldiers involved in human rights abuses, McDonald’s is complicit in Israel’s apartheid system. Boycotting the fast-food chain is seen as a way to pressure the company to end its support for the Israeli military.

These companies, either through their franchisees or corporate practices, have been involved in supporting Israel or its military actions. Some franchisees have provided material support to the Israeli army, while Wix, an Israeli company, fired an employee for criticizing Israel. Grassroots campaigns are targeting these brands to highlight their complicity in the apartheid system and to pressure them to change their policies. By boycotting these companies, activists hope to hold them accountable for their support of Israel’s occupation.

You can also download the complete BDS boycott list in PDF to share on social media platforms to be the active part of BDS movemet.

BDs Boycott List

Impact OF BDS Movement

Over the last 18 years, the BDS movement has built a powerful global network, uniting trade unions, farmers’ coalitions, and a variety of social justice movements to challenge Israel’s apartheid policies against Palestinians. Through relentless campaigns, BDS has successfully pressured multinational companies like G4S, Veolia, Orange, and PUMA to end their complicity in Israeli human rights violations.

The movement’s influence has expanded significantly, especially since Israel’s recent war on Gaza, where the BDS network intensified efforts to expose Israel’s war crimes and advocate for sanctions. This growing momentum has culminated in key political developments, such as the South African-led case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which ruled that Israel is plausibly committing genocide in Gaza, further legitimizing the BDS movement’s call for global action.

In addition to corporate withdrawal, BDS has sparked governmental actions that further isolate Israel. States like Bolivia and Jordan have downgraded or suspended relations with Israel, while nations like Spain and Belgium have voted to halt arms trade. The African Union suspended Israel’s observer status, and Norway’s sovereign fund divested nearly half a billion dollars in Israeli bonds, a major target for BDS campaigns.

On the corporate side, companies like McDonald’s and Puma have faced significant reputational and financial hits due to consumer boycotts and divestments. These actions, amplified by the BDS movement, are reshaping international policies and corporate behaviors, signaling a profound shift in global accountability for Israel’s violations of international law.

Immediate Impact

The BDS movement has raised significant global awareness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It has led to some institutions and companies withdrawing their support from Israeli businesses, which has increased scrutiny of Israeli policies.

Long-Term Impact

Over time, BDS has influenced global discourse on Israel’s policies. While some view the movement as a powerful tool for promoting Palestinian rights, others criticize it for being divisive and potentially undermining peace efforts (Haaretz).

Public Response

The BDS movement is supported by numerous human rights organizations, activists, and some governments. However, it also faces opposition from pro-Israel groups and critics who argue that it may be counterproductive or biased. The debate often centers around whether BDS fosters dialogue or further entrenches divisions.

Support:
Support for the BDS movement often comes from advocacy groups, human rights organizations, and academic institutions that view it as a non-violent strategy to address human rights issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many activists believe BDS is an effective way to pressure Israel to comply with international law and address Palestinian grievances.

Opposition:
Critics argue that BDS can be divisive, potentially undermining efforts for peace and dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians. Some view it as a form of economic warfare that could harm innocent workers and not just the Israeli government.

Governmental and Public Responses

United States:
The U.S. government has generally been critical of the BDS movement. In recent years, several states have passed laws or executive orders aimed at countering BDS efforts. For example, in 2024, several states including Texas and Florida have enacted legislation that prohibits state contracts and investments with entities that support BDS. This legislation aims to curb the movement’s impact by penalizing those who boycott Israeli businesses.

United Kingdom:
The UK’s response to the BDS movement has been mixed. In 2024, the UK government has continued to oppose the BDS movement, with Foreign Secretary James Cleverly stating that the government sees BDS as detrimental to peace efforts and a barrier to constructive dialogue. The UK government has also discouraged public institutions from endorsing BDS initiatives, emphasizing the need for direct negotiation and dialogue.

European Union:
The European Union has taken a more nuanced stance. While it does not officially support BDS, the EU has emphasized the need for both parties to engage in dialogue and has called for respect for international law regarding Israeli settlements. In recent years, the EU has issued statements supporting a two-state solution and criticizing settlement expansion but has stopped short of endorsing the BDS movement.

Conclusion

The BDS movement seeks to address significant issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through non-violent measures like boycotts, divestment, and sanctions. It has achieved notable successes in raising awareness and influencing global policies, though it remains a contentious and polarizing issue. Keep in touch with Boycotlists.com to monitor the campaign and to get most updated BDS boycott list.

Future Outlook

As of 2024, the BDS movement continues to be an active force in global discussions on Israeli policies. Its future will depend on ongoing international support and the broader political context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Most Popular Questions

The BDS Boycott list refers to companies and institutions that the BDS movement actively calls for boycotting, divesting from, and sanctioning. The movement focuses on companies that are complicit in Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories, its military actions, or those benefiting from Israeli settlements, which are deemed illegal under international law. BDS boycott list includes companies that are seen as enabling human rights violations against Palestinians.

Coca-Cola is officially on the BDS boycott list. Also, it has been informally boycotted by pro-Palestinian activists due to its business operations in Israel. However, Coca-Cola has repeatedly stated that it does not have any involvement in Israeli military activities

No, Starbucks is not officially on the BDS Boycott list. The BDS movement primarily targets companies that have direct business ties or investments in Israel’s military and settlement activities in occupied territories. While Starbucks has been subject to boycotts, especially related to perceived pro-Israel ties, it is not an official target in BDS boycott list.